Port 438 sits in the well-known range (0-1023), officially assigned by IANA to a service called "dsfgw"—DSF Gateway. Both TCP and UDP. Registered, documented, claimed.
And almost nobody uses it.
What Lives Here (Theoretically)
According to IANA's official registry, port 438 belongs to dsfgw. DSF Gateway. What is DSF Gateway? That's the question. Network documentation mentions it exists. Cisco's NBAR protocol packs acknowledge it. But finding actual technical specifications, RFCs, or real-world deployments? That trail goes cold.12
This is not a protocol that people deploy. It's not a service that administrators configure. It's a name in a registry that points to something that may have mattered once, or was planned to matter, and then didn't.
What Actually Shows Up Here
Some sources confuse port 438 with Apple Filing Protocol (AFP).3 AFP actually lives on port 548. The confusion is understandable—both are in the well-known range, both relate to file services, both start with vowels. But they're different ports, different protocols, different purposes.
When security scanners probe port 438, they're usually looking for what shouldn't be there: malware that picked an obscure port number hoping nobody would notice.4 A Trojan was observed using this port in the past—not because port 438 has any special properties, but because abandoned ports make good hiding places.
The Well-Known Range
Port 438 occupies space in the well-known port range (0-1023). These ports were assigned by IANA in the early days of the Internet, reserved for system services that needed privileged access and universal recognition. Binding to a well-known port requires root privileges on Unix systems—a security feature that acknowledges these ports were meant for important things.
Port 438 was assigned like it mattered. Then the service it was assigned to never became important enough for people to remember what it does.
Why Unassigned Feels Different Than Unused
There's a difference between a port that was never assigned and a port that was assigned but abandoned. Unassigned ports (the gaps in IANA's registry) are empty by design—available space for future services. Port 438 isn't empty. It's claimed. It has an owner that nobody can find.
This creates a peculiar kind of technical debt. The port can't be reassigned because it's registered. It can't be used for its intended purpose because nobody knows what that purpose fully entails. It just sits there, taking up space in the registry, occasionally confusing people who wonder what "dsfgw" means.
Checking What's Actually Listening
If you want to see what's actually using port 438 on your system:
On Linux/macOS:
On Windows:
Most of the time, you'll find nothing. Port 438 sits silent, waiting for a service that isn't running.
Security Considerations
Port 438 doesn't have inherent security vulnerabilities because the service that's supposed to run there barely exists. The risk is confusion. When something does bind to port 438, it's worth questioning what it is and why it chose this particular number.
Firewalls typically block port 438 by default—not because dsfgw is dangerous, but because the port isn't needed. If you find it open, ask why.5
The Fate of Forgotten Ports
Port 438 represents a category of infrastructure that the Internet carries forward: decisions made decades ago that nobody can quite undo. IANA assigned this port when the registry was young, when the Internet was smaller, when maybe DSF Gateway seemed like it would matter.
It didn't matter. But the port remains, officially registered, taking up one of the 1,024 well-known slots that were supposed to be precious.
This is what institutional memory looks like in networked systems—not grand archives of important decisions, but small assignments that outlive their purpose, numbers that persist long after anyone remembers why they were chosen.
Port 438 is still there. Registered. Official. Forgotten.
Was this page helpful?